Sunday, September 6, 2009

Succumbing to plausible deniability!

Once again, the political wall of deceit has shown a light of truth in another rumor. The rumored communist, Van Jones has resigned in a clueless absorption of DC corruption. Don't be fooled with the conclusion that all is done. The political will succumb to the Administration's “plausible deniability”.

The rumors in the Capitol, have been inundated with the ring of truth. It doesn't take much to turn from propaganda to that of all-out perversion of the matters at hand. This Administration needs to partake of historical fact, “Where are the President's advisors? Or lack thereof. Taxpayer dollars have been frivolously spent to found Obama's special advisors, yet there doesn't seem to be much in the proper advisory of such matters. Let's break this down into simpler terms.

Let's break this down into simpler terms. The President can appoint cabinet members with legislative confirmation. The current cabinet consists of 15 executive-level departments, 6 non-department administrative heads with Cabinet level rank, and the assumption of 2 other department heads with Cabinet level rank. Each Administration has amending authority of such matters. Along with the (non-confirmed) special advisory appointments, the total number of advisors is 50+.

You might ask, “That seems to be high in number. Are you sure that you have it right?”

To my thinking, this is an enormous point of contract. This administration should be impervious to flawed individuality. In answer to the question of the number, I will summarize the current list of such non-confirmed appointments. Such appointments have been alluded to being (Czars), though I will let you judge for yourself.

Why is there such frivolous spending on such positions? As a youth, I thought the Cabinet was all the president needed. Was I way off? With such a vast support staff, why would the president be unknowing of the history of such members. The position of President allows for the vetting of any potential threat of security. The respect and authority of such a position must be protected. The question to this would be, “Was a vetting process used to post such positions, or was it based on friendship? And why?”

The current administration (or any other) has no plausible reasoning to allow for such persons being posted. Where is the outrage of the forbearance of the Socialist agenda? Why is there no accountability from President Obama? He orates the dismissal of our rights, yet he is forsaking the very oath to defend the Constitution. That by which, these rights and liberties were guaranteed. I want answers. Don't you? I am Citizen, and I am of the people. Hear my voice.

I would like to thank the great Americans, who have researched and found fact on the issues of the day. Though I do not always agree with them, I must remind you of the importance of the respect and dignity granted of the post of President of the United States of America. You don't have to respect the person, for the seat exudes it's own allure of respect and authority.

To set my opinion aside, I would like to ask you just one question. “Has your President been found to abide by his duties set forth in this oath?”

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Thank you, and good day. “REFORM, REFORM, REFORM!”

No comments:

Post a Comment