A matter of State

The Tenth Amendment is being put to the test by a sitting United States President. That's right, Obama is suing the State of Texas for enforcing its own constitutional rights. With this, I have to ask why is he so adamant about enforcing international law over that of his own constitutional duties of protecting and defending the Constitution.

The Constitution does not show reverence to such international law. It does however render such treaties of international concern to that of Executive oversight with the confirmation of such by the Legislative branch.

Let me explain the matter, as best as I can. Humberto Leal, a Dream Act individual, was convicted of a 1994 rape and murder of a 16 year old female. She was found with bite marks on her remains and her head battered with a rock. As to the record, she was raped before and after death. Is this a punishable offense? I would have to say, YES!

Some might ask what was meant by Dream Act. Quickly referenced, this is an acronym for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors. It was first introduced in the United States Senate in 2001. Basically the bill would provide permanent residency to illegal alien students who graduate from U. S. high schools, who have a good moral character. They would have arrived illegally into the United States as a minor, and would have resided in the country for at least five years prior to the enactment.

The bill has been reintroduced several times throughout the last decade in various forms, always falling short of the needed votes. All with varying degrees of requirements and prerequisites. The matter has been sponsored by various bipartisan factions.

With this being stated, I refer to Humberto Leal as a Dream Act individual. I also must reiterate that this Mr. Leal is NOT of a good moral character. Not to mention, had been a resident of the United States since he was two years old, and therefore had no rightful title to that of Mexican citizenship. That is if you abide the liberal agenda of the duopoly and the current sitting President as well.

Mr. Leal has been seen by his so-called Consul of Mexico. The court records show that all due process was given him. He has appealed on all avenues to delay the inevitable. He plead guilty before his arrest was attained, and did not immediately assert his Mexican citizenship until after his arrest. According to the legal guidelines set down by the political left does not allow for the questioning as to the citizenship of an individual. Therefore the accused was given due process of that of a United States Citizen.

The suit filed by the Administration is obviously an elaborate, yet obvious election year ploy for the Hispanic vote. Its case however is to be considered to an over-riding stay of execution. The official standing of the State of Texas as being with its legal dominion to decide such matters. A docket is set for a supreme Court of the United States decision on the matter. It will nonetheless be a delay of such until decision is rendered.

If the Court does not render their hand to that of Leal's fate, his only recourse would be entirely within the realm of Governor Rick Perry. The decision will obviously be a burden upon Perry as he is considering a possible run for President in 2012.

Perry's decision will definitely show whether he is constitutional or a mere arm of the establishment. What will he do? It is a rare but significant matter for a Governor to decide such a matter, and constitutional duty sworn to uphold. The decision is his, and could decide his own political career. I for one, am asking Gov. Perry to perform his duties and follow the requests of the citizens of Texas. This is however a matter for Texas, and not that of the President of the United States.

As a citizen of Indiana, I will not make any request for the matter to go anyway but that of constitutional authority. It is a Texas matter, and all others should have no say.

The only duties of the President and the supreme Court on this matter is the defense of the Tenth Amendment. This right of the State is clearly presented in the United States Constitution.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Plain and simple, the words are clear and concise. I stand strong in my conviction of protecting the rights granted via the Constitution, especially the First Amendment right of freedom of speech and the freedom to practice such in the writing I have presented.

With these rights invoked, “Obama, keep your hands off!”

Take another bow...

Endorsement, that brings a quick smile to my face. The President seems to not understand that his endorsement means nothing. What could be worse for the nation of India, than this arrogant man to give his endorsement. We all saw what happened to his endorsements in the recent midterms. With his endorsement, he has unknowingly brought about the probable grumbling of an already uneasy China. How will China react to the matter of a permanent U. N Security Council seat?

The ever-growing economy of India assures a growth of influence on both trade and climate change. The latter being an Obama agenda. Just where is he going with this pushed influence. As if he actually has any world influence.

His fundamental change is "NOT" working at home, and he obnoxiously believes he can toss his version of fundamental upon the world. He has evidently ascended the clouds of his own footsteps, in believing he can teach his idea of democracy to that of the world's largest democracy, India. "Quick, someone grab him from that stairway to the clouds before he hurts his ego!"

President Obama is trying to teach accountability and responsibility to people of the world, and that is a subject he does not understand. So, he is in no position to suggest any fixes when he cannot even fix the problems in his electorate country. Ten days, will it be enough time to digest his lack of forthcoming in progressive reform.

What are the other security council members thinking about his endorsement? I can honestly say that the vote will not immediately be put to a vote. Stacking the courts and that of the U. N. will only lead to the One World agenda.

He believes that India offers benefits that can be enhanced by a multi-billion trade deal. Is this reassurance enough?

Obama has set the groundwork for what could be seen as a potential trade war between the markets of both India and China. Does anyone have to ask where this trade war would lead? It can only be a mere step towards derision.

The American entourage has an estimated compliment of security, aides, diplomats and business executives. I will not try to estimate the cost to the taxpayer, but will assume the cost is unwarranted. What does he think he is doing spending OUR dollars on nothing more than another vacation for the Obama household. All at the cost of stolen tax dollars.

During the ten day economic tour, he will most-assuredly attend the G20 summit. He will arrogantly push for protective measures against the deavaluing of world currencies. His arrogance shows through with this agenda being that he has a more pressing need at home to protect our dollar value. This being said, he should stop the printing press, and permanently extend the current tax cuts.

One thing can be assured, the new trade deal can only harm the United States. The President will relinquish our trade authority for that of the foreign market. Meaning, any restrictions would only hinder the domestic market while powering the international market.

So, the proof is in the tale. Obama has taken another bow!

As always, I am making statement of One Man's Opinion!

...true given authority

It can be seen in today's society that nothing is apolitical. Whether it be religion, school, Barack Obama, or the Tea Party, none are out of range.

The endless rhetoric of racism and bigotry can be heard in resolve to the mere truth of disagreement. It is ideological in my belief that America itself was founded on grounds of disagreement. Was it not a disagreement that stirred rebellion by the colonials against their faraway overlords?

Why must one use such rhetoric as a defense against opposition? While I am of a definite political bias, the mere idea that my opposing views on any matter are not racist but of a view of the First Amendment. The same accusers are also the very elected officials that are appointed of, for, and by the people. Therefore, We the people are the true given authority.

These same officials tend to treat us as if we were mere imbeciles. Most everyone in the elitist league and consider themselves as overlords, and not elected officials. Take Baron Hill, he has the nerve to tell us not to tell him how to run his office. Yet he has no problem in telling others how to run theirs. Those in the likes of Mr. Hill, just find themselves out of work much like the many constituents that are unemployed as well.

If you oppose the views of Barack Obama, then you are a racist. The same goes for the Rangel matter of ethics violations. If you disagree, you are un-American, racist, and uneducated. That is how they see us.

Some might disagree with me, call me racist, and abhor my beliefs. Yet I am citizen sovereign in my own right. As are you. The Constitution is the guarantor of this right. Does the Constitution not state the fact that it is of, for, and by the people?

I don't blame the President for his agenda, and the actions related. He is but a mere man in a position of prestige. The real power broker just happens to be Congress. The elected representatives in these houses are able to counter any and all activity by the sitting President. Are they not?

Yet I do blame the President for his race-baiting. He has the inept ability to hide behind the nation's past racial and social tensions. He accuses all that oppose him of being anti-government. Has he ever thought that he might just be wrong? What am I thinking, of course not!

Somewhere in his life he began to hate America and all aspects of life within such. Is there anything short of the total destruction of our nation that would appease him? At times I find myself wondering if he was brokering our sovereignty to the likes of the United Nations, and the likes.

Not to let all blame fall upon the the left-leaning President, I find fault in the other members of our elected officials. Those in position of people granted authority such as Senators and Representatives, are also to blame. The current fault is upon the heads of Democrats. The Democrats are in an overwhelming headship of the majority in all houses, including the WhiteHouse.

This being said, why is it that these same headships want blame others for uncanny inability to forward their hard-pressed agenda? They always throw blame upon the lackluster minority members. That is where the bi-partisan antics begin. It doesn't really matter which party is in control, the partisan politics begin.

The Republicans had their chance in years past and all they did was momentary and their own partisan agendas were pushed. The truth is they are all the same, a duopoly, you might say. Two branches of the same party. Do they ever relinquish the real authority? Well maybe the headship, but not without backroom dealings of earmarks and committee seats.

So, in conclusion I ponder the idea of We the people...

We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

What a masterful sense of the word. We the People says it all. What does it say to you? To make reason of my bantering, We the People are the one and only authority, with the blessing of God Almighty.

“REFORM! REFORM! REFORM!”

State-based racism is still just that...

Once again the state run media has overlooked the truth. Racism has been an ongoing factor in all of the current administration's policies. The latest fiasco within the Administration's Agriculture Department has shown light to another of the self-righteous President's race-based agendas. We can't let ourselves be fooled into believing that this fiasco was not a decoy to lure our attentions away from his force-fed socialization plans. All the while he is laying foundation for his total breakdown of the very founding of OUR nation.

Certain members of the press seem to think that while President Barack Obama should have been enjoying his recent legislation wins, race seemed to distract the attention away from his socialist agenda. No matter how it is ployed, this agenda would not pass scrutiny of the general public. Therefore, the only way to allow its concurrent existence is to distract OUR attention away from the truth with frivolous cries of racism and bigotry. The truth be known, the only pushed racism is that flowing the oval office itself.

Although deliberate, the President and his crony administration is lacking in scrutinized discipline. His lack of experience, along with his arrogance have eroded public approval of his policies. Most assuredly, a one-term President, he will undoubtedly aspire in his opportunistic community organizing.

Obama's own predilection has allowed for another of his uninformed bias of such matters involving his own administration. When will he learn to find out what is going on in his own establishment? It beckons me to think on who really puppeteers the White House.

These mistakes, one by one, will dis-establish the President from his ever-decreasing approval ratings. He has shown very little interest in race relations, and has actually driven race more to the forefront of the American society. It is nothing more than a matter of race-baiting and government condoned racism.

It is not at issue, the idea that a blogger was news breaker for the NAACP-Department of Agriculture speaking engagement. The real concern should be that the President and his Administration reacted to such without finding fact to the issue. Let alone the real truth, in question.

I have heard the video, in whole. To set the truth of the matter, it was an active endorsement of reverse racism. We cannot allow for the matter to be pushed aside as a mere act of false reporting. The Administration, itself led off with the immediate dismissal of the department member. Why would they fire one of their own unless they found a wrong-doing? I have found myself pondering the question, was she just a scapegoat to view the White House as innocent of all such manners? Highly probable.

It is amazing how all of this happened to take up most of a work week. Not to mention a week of the government's financial takeover (financial regulatory reform) and a laughable effort of Obama's pretending to make effort to revive the economy and reduce the unemployment problem. Be assured, it was part of his grand scheme. It's a lie!

Noting his past Presidential voicing of opinion on racism, he has managed to wrongly indict a police department, and now one of his own. When is he going to understand his duties, and to whom his responsibilities are rested. For one, he is President and not a judge. Second, he is to be responsible and accountable to the citizen. He is a public servant, and not a monarch.

I have to ask myself, "Does he even know the difference?"

Let us not forget the matter of the New Black Panther Party and their violation of civil rights and the criminal impediment of voters' rights. The charges were dropped by Attorney General Eric Holder. Although he was informed of the dismissal of charges, it is not known when and what he knew of the matter. As AG, one would think that nothing would pass through that office without knowledge of the AG. With that being said, is the AG so inept at his duties as to not be informed of what is happening in his own office? Sounds like pure irresponsibility and a clear case reasoning for dismissal from his duties as the AG.

The case might have been dismissed by the predecessor's administration, yet the Obama administration should have followed through with the matter, in order to show truth in campaign promises. That seems to be a lot to be asked for, knowing the regime  and its dealings with other such matters.

President Obama should take heed to his own words, "to take our time and think these issues through."

In todays life and politics, there is no room for racism or any other bigotry. The President should have have enough respect for the people's office (President), and himself. It is time for the government to stand firm in their action/reactions in regards to racism and bigotry. I am sure there are more pressing matters that need attended to. If they can't find any, I would be more than happy to recommend some issues.

One man's opinion is just that, an opinion! We all have one and all should use it. That is what the founding of our nation was based. Opinion and freedom run together as one, and one for the other.