A matter of State

The Tenth Amendment is being put to the test by a sitting United States President. That's right, Obama is suing the State of Texas for enforcing its own constitutional rights. With this, I have to ask why is he so adamant about enforcing international law over that of his own constitutional duties of protecting and defending the Constitution.

The Constitution does not show reverence to such international law. It does however render such treaties of international concern to that of Executive oversight with the confirmation of such by the Legislative branch.

Let me explain the matter, as best as I can. Humberto Leal, a Dream Act individual, was convicted of a 1994 rape and murder of a 16 year old female. She was found with bite marks on her remains and her head battered with a rock. As to the record, she was raped before and after death. Is this a punishable offense? I would have to say, YES!

Some might ask what was meant by Dream Act. Quickly referenced, this is an acronym for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors. It was first introduced in the United States Senate in 2001. Basically the bill would provide permanent residency to illegal alien students who graduate from U. S. high schools, who have a good moral character. They would have arrived illegally into the United States as a minor, and would have resided in the country for at least five years prior to the enactment.

The bill has been reintroduced several times throughout the last decade in various forms, always falling short of the needed votes. All with varying degrees of requirements and prerequisites. The matter has been sponsored by various bipartisan factions.

With this being stated, I refer to Humberto Leal as a Dream Act individual. I also must reiterate that this Mr. Leal is NOT of a good moral character. Not to mention, had been a resident of the United States since he was two years old, and therefore had no rightful title to that of Mexican citizenship. That is if you abide the liberal agenda of the duopoly and the current sitting President as well.

Mr. Leal has been seen by his so-called Consul of Mexico. The court records show that all due process was given him. He has appealed on all avenues to delay the inevitable. He plead guilty before his arrest was attained, and did not immediately assert his Mexican citizenship until after his arrest. According to the legal guidelines set down by the political left does not allow for the questioning as to the citizenship of an individual. Therefore the accused was given due process of that of a United States Citizen.

The suit filed by the Administration is obviously an elaborate, yet obvious election year ploy for the Hispanic vote. Its case however is to be considered to an over-riding stay of execution. The official standing of the State of Texas as being with its legal dominion to decide such matters. A docket is set for a supreme Court of the United States decision on the matter. It will nonetheless be a delay of such until decision is rendered.

If the Court does not render their hand to that of Leal's fate, his only recourse would be entirely within the realm of Governor Rick Perry. The decision will obviously be a burden upon Perry as he is considering a possible run for President in 2012.

Perry's decision will definitely show whether he is constitutional or a mere arm of the establishment. What will he do? It is a rare but significant matter for a Governor to decide such a matter, and constitutional duty sworn to uphold. The decision is his, and could decide his own political career. I for one, am asking Gov. Perry to perform his duties and follow the requests of the citizens of Texas. This is however a matter for Texas, and not that of the President of the United States.

As a citizen of Indiana, I will not make any request for the matter to go anyway but that of constitutional authority. It is a Texas matter, and all others should have no say.

The only duties of the President and the supreme Court on this matter is the defense of the Tenth Amendment. This right of the State is clearly presented in the United States Constitution.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Plain and simple, the words are clear and concise. I stand strong in my conviction of protecting the rights granted via the Constitution, especially the First Amendment right of freedom of speech and the freedom to practice such in the writing I have presented.

With these rights invoked, “Obama, keep your hands off!”

State-based racism is still just that...

Once again the state run media has overlooked the truth. Racism has been an ongoing factor in all of the current administration's policies. The latest fiasco within the Administration's Agriculture Department has shown light to another of the self-righteous President's race-based agendas. We can't let ourselves be fooled into believing that this fiasco was not a decoy to lure our attentions away from his force-fed socialization plans. All the while he is laying foundation for his total breakdown of the very founding of OUR nation.

Certain members of the press seem to think that while President Barack Obama should have been enjoying his recent legislation wins, race seemed to distract the attention away from his socialist agenda. No matter how it is ployed, this agenda would not pass scrutiny of the general public. Therefore, the only way to allow its concurrent existence is to distract OUR attention away from the truth with frivolous cries of racism and bigotry. The truth be known, the only pushed racism is that flowing the oval office itself.

Although deliberate, the President and his crony administration is lacking in scrutinized discipline. His lack of experience, along with his arrogance have eroded public approval of his policies. Most assuredly, a one-term President, he will undoubtedly aspire in his opportunistic community organizing.

Obama's own predilection has allowed for another of his uninformed bias of such matters involving his own administration. When will he learn to find out what is going on in his own establishment? It beckons me to think on who really puppeteers the White House.

These mistakes, one by one, will dis-establish the President from his ever-decreasing approval ratings. He has shown very little interest in race relations, and has actually driven race more to the forefront of the American society. It is nothing more than a matter of race-baiting and government condoned racism.

It is not at issue, the idea that a blogger was news breaker for the NAACP-Department of Agriculture speaking engagement. The real concern should be that the President and his Administration reacted to such without finding fact to the issue. Let alone the real truth, in question.

I have heard the video, in whole. To set the truth of the matter, it was an active endorsement of reverse racism. We cannot allow for the matter to be pushed aside as a mere act of false reporting. The Administration, itself led off with the immediate dismissal of the department member. Why would they fire one of their own unless they found a wrong-doing? I have found myself pondering the question, was she just a scapegoat to view the White House as innocent of all such manners? Highly probable.

It is amazing how all of this happened to take up most of a work week. Not to mention a week of the government's financial takeover (financial regulatory reform) and a laughable effort of Obama's pretending to make effort to revive the economy and reduce the unemployment problem. Be assured, it was part of his grand scheme. It's a lie!

Noting his past Presidential voicing of opinion on racism, he has managed to wrongly indict a police department, and now one of his own. When is he going to understand his duties, and to whom his responsibilities are rested. For one, he is President and not a judge. Second, he is to be responsible and accountable to the citizen. He is a public servant, and not a monarch.

I have to ask myself, "Does he even know the difference?"

Let us not forget the matter of the New Black Panther Party and their violation of civil rights and the criminal impediment of voters' rights. The charges were dropped by Attorney General Eric Holder. Although he was informed of the dismissal of charges, it is not known when and what he knew of the matter. As AG, one would think that nothing would pass through that office without knowledge of the AG. With that being said, is the AG so inept at his duties as to not be informed of what is happening in his own office? Sounds like pure irresponsibility and a clear case reasoning for dismissal from his duties as the AG.

The case might have been dismissed by the predecessor's administration, yet the Obama administration should have followed through with the matter, in order to show truth in campaign promises. That seems to be a lot to be asked for, knowing the regime  and its dealings with other such matters.

President Obama should take heed to his own words, "to take our time and think these issues through."

In todays life and politics, there is no room for racism or any other bigotry. The President should have have enough respect for the people's office (President), and himself. It is time for the government to stand firm in their action/reactions in regards to racism and bigotry. I am sure there are more pressing matters that need attended to. If they can't find any, I would be more than happy to recommend some issues.

One man's opinion is just that, an opinion! We all have one and all should use it. That is what the founding of our nation was based. Opinion and freedom run together as one, and one for the other.

A newly governed Wall Street...

A newly governed Wall Street...

That is what they want you to believe. They, being the people's representatives in Washington, DC. All as the President is handed his second legislative usurpation of the rights and freedoms in OUR great nation. What glee, he must feel that his multi-faceted agenda is being force-fed to the American citizenry, one page at a time. I hope your hungry. This last feeding is 2300 pages.

Divisive in its party-splitting scenario, it was mostly upon party lines. The few dissenters of one party are merely affiliated as such, in name only. The overall vote was platform to the parties, and the very matter of concern. Clearly, it is seen as truth to the fact that neither party has regard for the common citizenry.

The repeal moniker is tossed about as if it might be an effective measure. Lets face the facts. In order for repeal to work, it has to be acted upon. The matter is purely of an authoritarian outlook. Neither party will want to relinquish the authority of such enacted measures. The taxing of the matter alone, would ensure a slush fund of vast proportions. So, I don't see an honest attempt to repeal such a measure. It is almost assured that if leadership on the hill changes hands, then there might minor attempts at recessing minor elements of the bill. Possibly even the reconsideration of the bills bureaucracy.

Yet, most opposition can be seen to opine their dissatisfaction with this enactment. The true question has to be, "Is the dissatisfaction because of its overstepping of authority, or the more likely, because it was not of your affiliated proposals?"

The left immediately showed enthusiasm as to the mere thought that the right might be deemed wrong in the people's eyes. All I can say is beware the follies of government, and don't render any measure as for any cause other than their own career orientation. Yet another reason for the need of more strenuous guidelines on term limitation, recall, and referendum.

Again, the President allowed his hatred for the traditional America. He immediately touted his discourse over the opposition's lurking views of repeal of the matter. It is all about the President and his agenda, and nothing else matters. To him, we the peole are the stepping stones to which he can subjugate the Constitution. Thus allowing for his anti-traditional American values.

Our dear, inexperienced President should mind his authority, as it is on loan from that of the people. That loan could be called in, yet would he allow for such reproach. Of course not. He continues to lay blame upon predecessors. When will he take heed that what happens from this point on is his baby and none others. He is the obvious reason for allowing the nations financial straits to spiral to an even lower state. How far will he let us fall? I would venture to say, all the way.

Where is the financial security he had promised in his campaign? Was it a lie? Does he have a stopping point? The answer is clear and concise, "NO!"

What he and his cronies refer to as financial protection is more of a government security. Reason being, the government can only prosper on your fear and reasoning so that the question of usurpation of rights and freedoms are not questioned. He states we will never again foot the bill after the enactment of this financial reform package. Are we so soon as to forget the Patriot Act?

There are three reasons for the dissenting voice of the citizenry. They are Scott Brown, Susan Collins, and Olympia Snowe. They are obviously the voice of "YES", and not the voice of their very campaign promises. So, if you have a problem with this matter then let them know. These dissenters are affiliated with the wrong party, or so it seems. Well, not really. the whole system is a matter of two branches of the same party.

The designation of the bill allows for so-called protections against the government-stressed, evil Wall Street. They are pleading for the measure as a defense aginst the risky activity of the finanial system as a whole. Sounds familiar doesn't it? An almost complete definitive the very government that is purporting to protecting the people and their nation.

As all is said and done, we are told that the results won't be known until the regulations and policies are taken to ground for measure. Another test of trust. What trust? I do not trust the administration or its cronies. The bill sets a so-called structure for protection of our stability. What stability? The very leadership sworn to protect us, has endeared a fear within all of the backbone of this nation. We just don't know where the next blow will be struck. Will it be us next?

It is only a matter of time before we, the citizens are struck down because of these so-called protections. A government mandate by this administration is nothing more than an atrocity to America. We the people must stand strong in our self-protection. If they (the un-representatives) can't tell us about legislations before they are enacted then we must explain it to them. Afterall it is a measure of reading, and all of those elitists are supposedly smarter than the mere peasants of this nation. What could hurt if a dummy such as myself actually read the legislation, before they rush it through? Well, maybe they might feel offended. We cannot violate their civil rights. As they say, "...to hell with our civil rights!"

As with the usual closing, I am laying out my disclaimer. The matters pertaining to all in this writing are solely my opinion, and mine alone. In regards to my belief in non-aggression in resolution of these matters stands as the proper manner of resolution, and I would all others to take heed of this advice.

Let your voice ring true in liberty.